PGRI vs. AFOS
PGRI (Putnam International Stock ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGRI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Putnam, while AFOS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by ARS Investment Partners. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGRI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
PGRI vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGRI achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 31.59% return.
PGRI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 26.78%
- YTD
- 31.59%
- 1Y
- 74.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGRI vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF | 8.61% | -1.11% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 31.59% | 10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGRI and AFOS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGRI vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
PGRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFOS
PGRI vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGRI | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGRI vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGRI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRI and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGRI | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -11.52% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -3.80% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -1.51% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility
PGRI vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGRI | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 22.00% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 21.74% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 21.74% | -0.97% |
PGRI vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGRI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGRI vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
PGRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than AFOS's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% |
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF | 0.11% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGRI and AFOS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRI.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.11% for PGRI.
PGRI is categorized as Actively Managed, while AFOS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRI and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for PGRI and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer