PGRI vs. BINT

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

PGRI (Putnam International Stock ETF) and BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGRI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Putnam, while BINT is a Global Equities fund managed by Bluemonte. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGRI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BINT.

Performance

PGRI vs. BINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGRI achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than BINT's 14.43% return.

PGRI

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 6.03%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINT

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 11.95%
• YTD: 14.43%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGRI vs. BINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF	8.61%	-1.11%
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	14.43%	3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PGRI and BINT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

PGRI vs. BINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 63
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRI vs. BINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PGRI	BINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.39	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.60	—

Drawdowns

PGRI vs. BINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, which is greater than BINT's maximum drawdown of -10.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRI and BINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGRI	BINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-10.94%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-2.06%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-1.53%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PGRI	BINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.77%	15.89%	+4.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.77%	15.69%	+5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.77%	15.69%	+5.08%

PGRI vs. BINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BINT's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGRI vs. BINT - Dividend Comparison

PGRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than BINT's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.74%	1.08%
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF	0.11%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGRI and BINT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, PGRI and BINT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PGRI or BINT?

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PGRI or BINT?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PGRI or BINT?

BINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.11% for PGRI.

What is the main difference between PGRI and BINT?

PGRI is categorized as Actively Managed, while BINT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRI and 0.23% for BINT.