TOT vs. FLXR

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) and FLXR (TCW Flexible Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOT is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by LionShares, while FLXR is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TOT charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FLXR.

Performance

TOT vs. FLXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TOT

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -1.80%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FLXR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 0.97%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	$13.36M	$16.28M	$17.08M
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	$11.96K	$10.63K	$29.27K

TOT vs. FLXR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	-2.08%
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT and FLXR is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

TOT vs. FLXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLXR

FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TOT vs. FLXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOT	FLXR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.76	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.42	—

Drawdowns

TOT vs. FLXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, which is greater than FLXR's maximum drawdown of -1.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and FLXR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOT	FLXR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-1.94%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-0.43%	-3.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-0.35%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOT	FLXR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	2.35%	+10.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	2.79%	+10.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	2.79%	+10.53%

TOT vs. FLXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOT vs. FLXR - Dividend Comparison

TOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	5.91%	5.66%	3.44%
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOT and FLXR in my portfolio?

TOT and FLXR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TOT or FLXR?

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOT or FLXR?

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FLXR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOT or FLXR?

FLXR has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for TOT.

What is the main difference between TOT and FLXR?

TOT is categorized as Actively Managed, while FLXR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: LionShares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 0.40% for FLXR.