TOT vs. BLUC

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) and BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOT is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by LionShares, while BLUC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Bluemonte. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TOT charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLUC.

Performance

TOT vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TOT

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLUC

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 1Y: 17.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOT vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	-0.19%
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT and BLUC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.97

Return for Risk

TOT vs. BLUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUC

BLUC Risk / Return Rank: 47
BLUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BLUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BLUC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BLUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
BLUC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOT vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOT	BLUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.30	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.54	—

Drawdowns

TOT vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, smaller than the maximum BLUC drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and BLUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOT	BLUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-10.69%	+6.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-3.41%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-1.70%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOT	BLUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.51%	13.75%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.51%	13.46%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.51%	13.46%	+0.05%

TOT vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUC's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TOT vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

TOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	0.63%	0.46%
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOT and BLUC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, TOT and BLUC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TOT or BLUC?

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOT or BLUC?

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLUC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOT or BLUC?

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for TOT.

What is the main difference between TOT and BLUC?

TOT is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLUC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: LionShares and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 0.23% for BLUC.