PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne (MOH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TOT.TO is traded in CAD, while MOH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MOH.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOT.TO achieves a 74.53% return, which is significantly higher than MOH.DE's -24.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TOT.TO has underperformed MOH.DE with an annualized return of 8.47%, while MOH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.


TOT.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
5.33%
YTD
74.53%
6M
75.92%
1Y
158.30%
3Y*
47.19%
5Y*
44.99%
10Y*
8.47%

MOH.DE

1D
2.87%
1M
6.56%
YTD
-24.12%
6M
-24.41%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
-11.38%
5Y*
-2.49%
10Y*
15.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services Inc.
74.53%33.38%58.37%-8.79%46.31%83.84%-48.91%-32.11%-32.79%3.71%
MOH.DE
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne
-24.12%10.96%-10.51%9.34%-3.47%32.26%35.42%57.61%7.64%49.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT.TO and MOH.DE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2009

0.09

The correlation between TOT.TO and MOH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOT.TO
TOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MOH.DE
MOH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MOH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne (MOH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOT.TOMOH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.06

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.28

0.17

+15.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.05

0.34

+41.71

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.90, which is higher than the MOH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOT.TO and MOH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOT.TOMOH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90

0.17

+4.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

-0.08

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.56

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.56

-0.19

Drawdowns

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than MOH.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT.TO and MOH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOT.TOMOH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.01%

-45.73%

-47.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-31.70%

+21.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.89%

-45.02%

+17.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

-45.73%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.13%

-45.73%

-44.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.03%

-38.99%

+33.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-10.15%

-28.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

15.51%

-11.73%

Volatility

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne (MOH.DE) at 8.75%. This indicates that TOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOT.TOMOH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.21%

8.75%

+5.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.22%

22.12%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.60%

32.01%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.19%

30.47%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.72%

28.10%

+11.62%

Dividends

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Dividend Comparison

TOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than MOH.DE's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOH.DE
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne
2.74%2.04%2.05%1.70%1.74%0.96%1.79%1.49%2.14%1.70%2.00%2.23%
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services Inc.
1.62%2.68%3.12%4.23%2.09%0.00%0.00%3.74%2.46%1.62%1.65%1.77%

Financials

TOT.TO vs. MOH.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Total Energy Services Inc. and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. TOT.TO values in CAD, MOH.DE values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


TOT.TO and MOH.DE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOT.TO and MOH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer