PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOH.DE vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne (MOH.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MOH.DE is traded in EUR, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOH.DE achieves a -24.42% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MOH.DE has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 14.66%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.


MOH.DE

1D
2.64%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
-24.42%
6M
-23.29%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
-14.71%
5Y*
-4.33%
10Y*
14.66%

BRK-B

1D
0.00%
1M
3.05%
YTD
-3.69%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
-3.50%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOH.DE
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne
-24.42%3.01%-12.42%8.38%-3.90%43.75%26.43%68.02%4.19%39.93%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-0.98%-2.27%35.48%12.00%9.71%38.60%-6.07%13.44%7.84%6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MOH.DE and BRK-B is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.24

The correlation between MOH.DE and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOH.DE
MOH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MOH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne (MOH.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOH.DEBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.97

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.32

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

-0.66

+0.78

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOH.DE and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOH.DEBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

-0.24

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.66

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.63

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.49

-0.19

Drawdowns

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOH.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -45.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOH.DE and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOH.DEBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.67%

-45.91%

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.59%

-11.04%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.89%

-20.62%

-28.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.14%

-22.31%

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.14%

-28.74%

-20.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.51%

-17.01%

-26.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-9.73%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.12%

5.31%

+9.81%

Volatility

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne (MOH.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.71%. This indicates that MOH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOH.DEBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.71%

3.71%

+5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.12%

11.20%

+9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.15%

14.94%

+16.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.70%

17.37%

+12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.05%

20.09%

+7.96%

Dividends

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

MOH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOH.DE
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne
2.74%2.04%2.05%1.70%1.74%0.96%1.79%1.49%2.14%1.70%2.00%2.23%

Financials

MOH.DE vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MOH.DE values in EUR, BRK-B values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MOH.DE and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOH.DE and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer