PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOT.TO vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TOT.TO is traded in CAD, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOT.TO achieves a 73.66% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TOT.TO has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 8.24%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.93% annualized return.


TOT.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
5.97%
YTD
73.66%
6M
76.94%
1Y
152.34%
3Y*
47.66%
5Y*
44.84%
10Y*
8.24%

MSFT

1D
-2.77%
1M
5.61%
YTD
-10.11%
6M
-10.50%
1Y
-5.76%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
15.37%
10Y*
25.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services Inc.
73.66%33.38%58.37%-8.79%46.31%83.84%-48.91%-32.11%-32.79%3.71%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-10.11%10.28%22.63%54.71%-22.90%51.10%40.13%49.81%31.04%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT.TO and MSFT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.09

The correlation between TOT.TO and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TOT.TO:

CA$955.42M

MSFT:

$3.18T

EPS

TOT.TO:

CA$2.11

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

TOT.TO:

12.20

MSFT:

25.45

PEG Ratio

TOT.TO:

0.13

MSFT:

1.78

PS Ratio

TOT.TO:

0.86

MSFT:

10.01

PB Ratio

TOT.TO:

1.53

MSFT:

7.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

TOT.TO:

CA$1.13B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TOT.TO:

CA$158.42M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TOT.TO:

CA$187.13M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOT.TO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOT.TO
TOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOT.TOMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

0.98

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.70

-0.17

+14.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.61

-0.35

+40.96

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOT.TO and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOT.TOMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70

-0.23

+4.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.61

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

1.00

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.91

-0.54

Drawdowns

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT.TO and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOT.TOMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.01%

-34.17%

-58.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-34.17%

+23.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.89%

-34.17%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

-34.17%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.13%

-34.17%

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-20.95%

+15.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-7.53%

-30.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

16.69%

-12.92%

Volatility

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.24% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.61%. This indicates that TOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOT.TOMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.24%

9.61%

+4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.27%

22.18%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.60%

24.90%

+7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.39%

25.46%

+10.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.73%

25.95%

+13.78%

Dividends

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

TOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than MSFT's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.83%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services Inc.
1.63%2.68%3.12%4.23%2.09%0.00%0.00%3.74%2.46%1.62%1.65%1.77%

Financials

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Total Energy Services Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
314.90M
82.89B
(TOT.TO) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TOT.TO values in CAD, MSFT values in USD

TOT.TO vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Total Energy Services Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
14.7%
67.6%
Portfolio components
TOT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Total Energy Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.34M and revenue of 314.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.7%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

TOT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Total Energy Services Inc. reported an operating income of 26.30M and revenue of 314.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

TOT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Total Energy Services Inc. reported a net income of 24.14M and revenue of 314.90M, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TOT.TO and MSFT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOT.TO and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer