TOT.TO vs. NVO
Compare and contrast key facts about Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO).
Performance
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOT.TO Total Energy Services Inc. | 52.35% | 33.38% | 58.37% | -8.79% | 46.31% | 83.84% | -48.91% | -32.11% | -32.79% | 3.71% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -24.11% | -42.01% | -8.71% | 51.43% | 31.40% | 62.04% | 21.25% | 22.38% | -5.60% | 43.18% |
Different Trading Currencies
TOT.TO is traded in CAD, while NVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
TOT.TO:
CA$854.25M
NVO:
$163.46B
TOT.TO:
CA$1.96
NVO:
$22.15
TOT.TO:
11.56
NVO:
1.66
TOT.TO:
0.12
NVO:
0.07
TOT.TO:
0.81
NVO:
0.55
TOT.TO:
1.42
NVO:
0.84
TOT.TO:
CA$1.06B
NVO:
$297.20B
TOT.TO:
CA$151.91M
NVO:
$240.66B
TOT.TO:
CA$187.63M
NVO:
$153.18B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOT.TO achieves a 52.35% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -24.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TOT.TO has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 9.43%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.84% annualized return.
TOT.TO
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 25.41%
- YTD
- 52.35%
- 6M
- 58.68%
- 1Y
- 147.05%
- 3Y*
- 44.58%
- 5Y*
- 45.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
NVO
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- -24.11%
- 6M
- -31.40%
- 1Y
- -46.36%
- 3Y*
- -19.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOT.TO vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
TOT.TO
NVO
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOT.TO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.53 | -0.87 | +5.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | -1.11 | +5.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 0.85 | +0.79 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.15 | -0.83 | +10.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.20 | -1.45 | +32.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOT.TO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53 | -0.87 | +5.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.16 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.18 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.55 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between TOT.TO and NVO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
TOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than NVO's 5.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOT.TO Total Energy Services Inc. | 1.32% | 2.68% | 3.12% | 4.23% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.74% | 2.46% | 1.62% | 1.65% | 1.77% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 5.06% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT.TO and NVO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOT.TO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.01% | -74.70% | -18.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -55.03% | +40.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.94% | -74.70% | +40.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.13% | -74.70% | -15.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -73.25% | +69.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -17.55% | -20.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 31.69% | -26.97% |
Volatility
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) is 9.02%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that TOT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TOT.TO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 9.79% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.29% | 38.71% | -15.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.65% | 53.67% | -21.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.00% | 37.44% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.66% | 31.89% | +7.77% |
Financials
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Total Energy Services Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TOT.TO vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison
TOT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Total Energy Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.74M and revenue of 301.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.
NVO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 54.38B and revenue of 67.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.8%.
TOT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Total Energy Services Inc. reported an operating income of 25.38M and revenue of 301.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
NVO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 27.12B and revenue of 67.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.3%.
TOT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Total Energy Services Inc. reported a net income of 23.64M and revenue of 301.71M, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
NVO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 22.96B and revenue of 67.28B, resulting in a net margin of 34.1%.