TOS vs. USMV
TOS (Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TOS is actively managed, while USMV is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.
Performance
TOS vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOS
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMV
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
TOS vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 11.45% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOS and USMV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOS vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
TOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USMV
TOS vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOS | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOS vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, smaller than the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOS | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -33.10% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -1.78% | -7.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -2.86% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
TOS vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOS | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.00% | 8.53% | +18.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 12.38% | +14.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 14.50% | +12.50% |
TOS vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOS vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.49% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOS and USMV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TOS.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.
They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.15% for USMV.
Find the right allocation for TOS and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer