TOS vs. PSCX
TOS (Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
TOS vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
TOS vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 18.66% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOS and PSCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOS vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
TOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCX
TOS vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOS vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -10.20% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -1.09% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -1.85% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility
TOS vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.53% | 5.60% | +20.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 7.11% | +19.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 6.96% | +19.57% |
TOS vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOS vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither TOS nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TOS and PSCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TOS.
TOS and PSCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.75% for PSCX.
Find the right allocation for TOS and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer