PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOS vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOS vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TOS

1D
-4.55%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNAV

1D
-7.71%
1M
3.16%
YTD
34.15%
6M
33.13%
1Y
56.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOS vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOS and CNAV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOS vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOS

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOS vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOS vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOSCNAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

1.29

+0.45

Drawdowns

TOS vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOSCNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-30.06%

+18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-8.90%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-5.42%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

Volatility

TOS vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOSCNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.41%

26.34%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.41%

27.80%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.41%

27.80%

-1.39%

TOS vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOS vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither TOS nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TOS and CNAV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOS is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOS is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

TOS and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 1.31% for CNAV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOS and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer