PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOS vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOS vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TOS

1D
-4.55%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDGS

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.19%
YTD
4.84%
6M
4.77%
1Y
13.59%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOS vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOS and BDGS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOS vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOS

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOS vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOS vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOSBDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

1.72

+0.02

Drawdowns

TOS vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and BDGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOSBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-9.12%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-1.57%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-0.65%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

TOS vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOSBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.41%

6.12%

+20.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.41%

8.21%

+18.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.41%

8.21%

+18.20%

TOS vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOS vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.53%0.55%1.81%0.84%
TOS
Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOS and BDGS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOS is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOS is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.

They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.87% for BDGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOS and BDGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer