TOS vs. BDGS
TOS (Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
TOS vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOS
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOS vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 14.23% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 4.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOS and BDGS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOS vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
TOS
BDGS
TOS vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOS | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 1.72 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
TOS vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOS | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -9.12% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -1.57% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -0.65% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
TOS vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOS | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 6.12% | +20.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 8.21% | +18.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 8.21% | +18.20% |
TOS vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOS vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.53% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOS and BDGS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOS is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOS is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.
BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.
They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.87% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for TOS and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer