TOPW vs. FDL
TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TOPW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. TOPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
TOPW vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 11.51% return.
TOPW
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
TOPW vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 0.96% | -1.33% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 11.51% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOPW and FDL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOPW vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
TOPW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
TOPW vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOPW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOPW vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOPW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -65.93% | +36.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.65% | -4.09% | -11.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -9.64% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility
TOPW vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOPW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.68% | 11.49% | +16.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 14.32% | +13.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 17.13% | +10.55% |
TOPW vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOPW vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.84%, more than FDL's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.74% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 44.84% | 21.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOPW and FDL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TOPW.
TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 44.84%, compared with 3.74% for FDL.
TOPW is categorized as Derivative Income, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. TOPW tracks Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TOPW and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for TOPW and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer