TOPT vs. MTUM
TOPT (iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOPT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 20 Select Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TOPT returned 20.49% vs 28.30% for MTUM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOPT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
TOPT vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOPT achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 21.46% return.
TOPT
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- YTD
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 20.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 21.46%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.89%
TOPT vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | 6.88% | 20.35% | 5.33% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 21.46% | 22.15% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOPT and MTUM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between TOPT and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
TOPT vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOPT
MTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TOPT
MTUM
Communication Services
TOPT
MTUM
Financial Services
TOPT
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
TOPT
MTUM
Healthcare
TOPT
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
TOPT
MTUM
Energy
TOPT
MTUM
Basic Materials
TOPT
-
MTUM
Industrials
TOPT
-
MTUM
Real Estate
TOPT
-
MTUM
Utilities
TOPT
-
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOPT vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
TOPT
MTUM
TOPT vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOPT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.35 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 8.08 | -2.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOPT vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOPT drawdown since its inception was -21.21%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPT and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOPT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.21% | -34.08% | +12.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -12.11% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -12.11% | +8.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -6.20% | +2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 3.51% | +0.25% |
Volatility
TOPT vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) is 5.12%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that TOPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOPT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 12.40% | -7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 21.91% | -10.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 24.08% | -9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 21.61% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 21.55% | -1.74% |
TOPT vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOPT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TOPT vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
TOPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than MTUM's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOPT and MTUM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to TOPT (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOPT dropped -21.21% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 28.30% vs 20.49% for TOPT. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TOPT has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 28.30% return vs 20.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TOPT.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.38% for TOPT.
TOPT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. TOPT tracks S&P 500 Top 20 Select Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TOPT and 0.15% for MTUM.
TOPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOPT and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer