TOPT vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).
TOPT and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TOPT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 20 Select Index. It was launched on Nov 23, 2024. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. Both TOPT and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TOPT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TOPT vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | -8.27% | 20.35% | 5.03% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.82% | 19.51% | 3.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOPT achieves a -8.27% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's -7.82% return.
TOPT
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -8.27%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -7.82%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TOPT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TOPT and XLG have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TOPT vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
TOPT
XLG
TOPT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOPT | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.52 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.60 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 5.67 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOPT | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between TOPT and XLG is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TOPT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
TOPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than XLG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | 0.42% | 0.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
TOPT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOPT drawdown since its inception was -21.21%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPT and XLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOPT | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.21% | -52.39% | +31.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -12.41% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.05% | -9.56% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -7.69% | +4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.49% | +0.10% |
Volatility
TOPT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 5.86% and 5.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TOPT | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 5.76% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 10.64% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 19.97% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 18.69% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 18.81% | +1.66% |