TOLZ vs. VIS
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index while VIS tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.80%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for VIS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIS.
Performance
TOLZ vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.98% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 7.80%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 16.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
VIS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 28.15%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
TOLZ vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.63% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.98% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and VIS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TOLZ and VIS has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TOLZ vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
VIS
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
TOLZ
VIS
Utilities
TOLZ
VIS
Real Estate
TOLZ
VIS
Industrials
TOLZ
VIS
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
VIS
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
VIS
Technology
TOLZ
VIS
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
VIS
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
VIS
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
VIS
TOLZ vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOLZ | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 2.30 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 9.55 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOLZ | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.72 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.70 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.69 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.52 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -63.51% | +24.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -12.29% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -20.80% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -22.96% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -42.42% | +3.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -0.05% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -8.38% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.96% | -1.25% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.60%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 5.16% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 13.50% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 16.42% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 18.36% | -4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 20.43% | -4.13% |
TOLZ vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.62% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and VIS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to TOLZ (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.09% vs 7.80% for TOLZ. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.
TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.10% for VIS.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer