TOLZ vs. SQQQ
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.49%/yr vs -55.08%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -38.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 7.49%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.08% annualized return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- 17.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 5.01%
- 1M
- 8.33%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- YTD
- -38.86%
- 1Y
- -54.36%
- 3Y*
- -50.96%
- 5Y*
- -45.88%
- 10Y*
- -55.08%
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.47% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -38.86% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and SQQQ is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014 | -0.44 |
The correlation between TOLZ and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
SQQQ
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Utilities
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Industrials
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
SQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Technology
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
SQQQ
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.83 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | -0.89 | +4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | -1.63 | +11.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -100.00% | +60.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -61.03% | +55.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -92.51% | +80.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -97.27% | +75.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -99.97% | +60.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -100.00% | +98.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -92.76% | +86.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 33.36% | -31.52% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.65%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 22.32%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 22.32% | -18.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 46.22% | -37.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.60% | 55.87% | -45.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 67.91% | -53.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 66.57% | -50.35% |
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than SQQQ's 9.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.77% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.94% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to TOLZ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, TOLZ leads with 7.49% vs -55.08% for SQQQ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 7.49% return vs -55.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.77%, compared with 2.94% for TOLZ.
TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.95% for SQQQ.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer