TOLZ vs. SQQQ
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.76%/yr vs -56.25%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 7.76%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.25% annualized return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- -40.47%
- 6M
- -37.47%
- 1Y
- -59.36%
- 3Y*
- -53.90%
- 5Y*
- -46.94%
- 10Y*
- -56.25%
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 10.37% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.47% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and SQQQ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014 | -0.45 |
The correlation between TOLZ and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (all time) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
SQQQ
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Utilities
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Industrials
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
SQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Technology
TOLZ
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
SQQQ
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.79 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | -0.94 | +3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | -1.77 | +9.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -100.00% | +60.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -63.25% | +58.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -92.51% | +80.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -97.27% | +75.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -99.98% | +60.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.95% | -100.00% | +96.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -92.73% | +86.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 33.97% | -32.16% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.54%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.67%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 26.67% | -23.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 43.18% | -34.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 53.58% | -43.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 67.53% | -53.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 66.46% | -50.23% |
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than SQQQ's 11.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.47% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.69% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.67%) compared to TOLZ (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, TOLZ leads with 7.76% vs -56.25% for SQQQ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 7.76% return vs -56.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.47%, compared with 3.69% for TOLZ.
TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.95% for SQQQ.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer