TOLZ vs. FTXR
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and FTXR (First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index while FTXR tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TOLZ returned 8.58%/yr vs 8.38%/yr for FTXR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXR.
Performance
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than FTXR's 17.58% return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
FTXR
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 38.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.39% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 17.58% | 14.70% | 17.09% | 20.93% | -25.38% | 24.02% | 15.03% | 14.82% | -15.27% | 15.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and FTXR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TOLZ and FTXR has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
FTXR
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
FTXR
Utilities
TOLZ
FTXR
-
Real Estate
TOLZ
FTXR
-
Industrials
TOLZ
FTXR
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
FTXR
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
FTXR
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
FTXR
Technology
TOLZ
FTXR
-
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
FTXR
-
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
FTXR
-
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
FTXR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. FTXR — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
FTXR
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | FTXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.56 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 8.68 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum FTXR drawdown of -52.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and FTXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | FTXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -52.06% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -14.49% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -29.71% | +17.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -33.96% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.38% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -10.95% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 4.27% | -2.44% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.68%, while First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | FTXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 7.28% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 17.24% | -8.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.63% | 21.81% | -11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 23.97% | -9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 24.73% | -8.51% |
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. FTXR - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than FTXR's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 0.96% | 1.52% | 2.13% | 1.50% | 2.38% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 1.34% | 1.74% | 1.18% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.97% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and FTXR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXR has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to TOLZ (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs FTXR's -52.06%.
On 5-year performance, TOLZ leads with 8.58% vs 8.38% for FTXR. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXR.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.96% for FTXR.
TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.60% for FTXR.
FTXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and FTXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer