PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOCT vs. QFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOCT vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2027 (TOCT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOCT achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 6.90% return.


TOCT

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.88%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QFLR

1D
0.01%
1M
3.99%
YTD
6.90%
6M
5.88%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOCT vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOCT and QFLR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOCT vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOCT

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOCT vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2027 (TOCT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOCT vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOCTQFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Drawdowns

TOCT vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOCT drawdown since its inception was -2.02%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOCT and QFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOCTQFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-13.97%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.48%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-2.50%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

TOCT vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOCTQFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98%

11.28%

-8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.98%

12.62%

-9.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.98%

12.62%

-9.64%

TOCT vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOCT vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TOCT nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TOCT and QFLR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

TOCT and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TOCT and 0.89% for QFLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOCT and QFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer