TOAK vs. CGHM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) and CGHM (Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak, while CGHM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TOAK returned 3.95% vs 7.43% for CGHM. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TOAK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CGHM.

Performance

TOAK vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOAK achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than CGHM's 1.75% return.

TOAK

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.45%
• 6M: 1.77%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.99%

CGHM

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.68%
• 6M: 1.34%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF	$11.31M	$10.88M	$11.27M
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF	$423.36K	$353.18K	$391.26K

TOAK vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF	2.08%	4.28%	1.36%
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF	1.75%	4.56%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TOAK and CGHM is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024	-0.02

Return for Risk

TOAK vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TOAK

TOAK Risk / Return Rank: 62
TOAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TOAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TOAK Omega Ratio Rank: 96
TOAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TOAK Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CGHM

CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 91
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TOAK vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOAK	CGHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.62	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	3.79	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.57	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	3.22	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	11.90	-6.49

TOAK vs. CGHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOAK Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the CGHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOAK and CGHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOAK vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOAK drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum CGHM drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOAK and CGHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOAK	CGHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-5.90%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.81%	-2.55%	+0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-1.71%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-1.19%	+0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.69%	+0.03%

Volatility

TOAK vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison

Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) at 0.91%. This indicates that TOAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOAK	CGHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	0.91%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	2.41%	+0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12%	3.13%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.28%	4.42%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.28%	4.42%	-2.14%

TOAK vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOAK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOAK vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison

TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF	3.70%	3.61%	1.78%
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOAK and CGHM in my portfolio?

TOAK and CGHM have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOAK or CGHM?

TOAK has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to CGHM (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOAK dropped -1.81% vs CGHM's -5.90%.

Which ETF is better, TOAK or CGHM?

On 1-year performance, CGHM leads with 7.43% vs 3.95% for TOAK. On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CGHM has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOAK or CGHM?

Over the 1-year period, CGHM has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOAK or CGHM?

TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CGHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOAK or CGHM?

CGHM has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.

What is the main difference between TOAK and CGHM?

TOAK is categorized as Multistrategy, while CGHM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOAK and 0.34% for CGHM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.