PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOAK vs. SPYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOAK vs. SPYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOAK achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPYA's 6.66% return.


TOAK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.57%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYA

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
6.66%
6M
6.17%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOAK vs. SPYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TOAK
Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF
1.50%2.34%
SPYA
Twin Oak Endure ETF
6.66%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TOAK and SPYA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOAK vs. SPYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOAK
TOAK Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TOAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TOAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOAK Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYA
SPYA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SPYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOAK vs. SPYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOAKSPYADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.28

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.91

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

7.37

-1.04

TOAK vs. SPYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOAK Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the SPYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOAK and SPYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOAK vs. SPYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOAK drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum SPYA drawdown of -9.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOAK and SPYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOAKSPYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-9.51%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.81%

-9.51%

+7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.93%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-1.48%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

2.47%

-1.89%

Volatility

TOAK vs. SPYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) is 0.12%, while Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that TOAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOAKSPYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

4.32%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

9.25%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

11.77%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

11.59%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.19%

11.59%

-9.40%

TOAK vs. SPYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOAK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOAK vs. SPYA - Dividend Comparison

TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM2025
SPYA
Twin Oak Endure ETF
0.35%0.37%
TOAK
Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOAK and SPYA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYA has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to TOAK (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOAK dropped -1.81% vs SPYA's -9.51%.

On 1-year performance, SPYA leads with 18.13% vs 3.65% for TOAK. On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TOAK has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYA has performed better with a 18.13% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SPYA.

SPYA has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.

TOAK is categorized as Multistrategy, while SPYA is Equity Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOAK and 0.49% for SPYA.

SPYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOAK and SPYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer