TNVDX vs. CONWX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TNVDX (1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund) and CONWX (Concorde Wealth Management Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, TNVDX returned 5.81%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for CONWX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNVDX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for CONWX.

Performance

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNVDX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 6.98% return.

TNVDX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 14.26%
• 3Y*: 10.23%
• 5Y*: 5.81%
• 10Y*: —

CONWX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 6.98%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 12.21%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund	5.51%	10.45%	8.62%	9.34%	-8.50%	10.36%	13.50%	18.37%	-3.93%	8.11%
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund	6.98%	11.95%	13.58%	0.20%	-2.51%	19.73%	8.76%	16.84%	-1.95%	6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TNVDX and CONWX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between TNVDX and CONWX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TNVDX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNVDX

TNVDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
TNVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
TNVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TNVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
TNVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
TNVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CONWX

CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 71
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TNVDX	CONWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	2.38	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.49	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.43	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	4.50	-1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.03	13.12	-3.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNVDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNVDX and CONWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TNVDX	CONWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	2.38	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.64	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.76	+0.08

Drawdowns

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNVDX drawdown since its inception was -20.14%, smaller than the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNVDX and CONWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNVDX	CONWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.14%	-26.09%	+5.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-3.68%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.21%	-9.86%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.69%	-12.49%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.11%	+3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-2.78%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	1.26%	+0.18%

Volatility

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 1.42%. This indicates that TNVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNVDX	CONWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	1.42%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.70%	5.13%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.51%	6.96%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.15%	10.19%	-3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.71%	11.10%	-2.39%

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNVDX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNVDX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

TNVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than CONWX's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund	3.45%	3.69%	10.55%	2.16%	7.85%	3.63%	3.86%	2.16%	5.09%	2.48%
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund	8.09%	7.69%	9.73%	5.52%	4.67%	10.18%	8.15%	5.58%	5.02%	6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNVDX and CONWX in my portfolio?

TNVDX and CONWX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TNVDX or CONWX?

TNVDX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to CONWX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNVDX dropped -20.14% vs CONWX's -26.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.