PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNVDX vs. TNUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNVDX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly higher than TNUIX's 3.01% return.


TNVDX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.56%
6M
2.15%
YTD
4.53%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.12%

TNUIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
6M
1.67%
YTD
3.01%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
2.91%
ALL TIME*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNVDX
1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund
4.53%10.45%8.62%9.34%-8.50%10.36%13.50%18.37%-3.93%8.11%
TNUIX
1290 Diversified Bond Fund
3.01%10.61%-3.72%3.21%-12.54%-2.46%17.14%10.28%2.30%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TNVDX and TNUIX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.34

The correlation between TNVDX and TNUIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNVDX vs. TNUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TNVDX
TNVDX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TNVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TNVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

TNUIX
TNUIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TNUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TNUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNVDXTNUIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.35

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

6.49

+0.60

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNVDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the TNUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNVDX and TNUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNVDX drawdown since its inception was -20.14%, smaller than the maximum TNUIX drawdown of -26.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNVDX and TNUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNVDXTNUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

-26.30%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-2.71%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.21%

-11.28%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.69%

-24.99%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-5.78%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-6.28%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.98%

+0.49%

Volatility

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Volatility Comparison

1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) have volatilities of 1.14% and 1.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNVDXTNUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.16%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.18%

4.18%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

5.50%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.18%

9.50%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.67%

7.74%

+0.93%

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNVDX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than TNUIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNVDX vs. TNUIX - Dividend Comparison

TNVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than TNUIX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TNUIX
1290 Diversified Bond Fund
3.38%7.28%6.39%3.71%3.51%4.61%2.68%8.07%3.67%2.94%0.12%
TNVDX
1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund
7.80%7.69%9.73%5.52%4.67%10.18%8.15%5.58%5.02%6.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNVDX and TNUIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNUIX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to TNVDX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNVDX dropped -20.14% vs TNUIX's -26.30%.

TNVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNVDX and TNUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer