TNVDX vs. TNMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX).
TNVDX is managed by 1290 Funds. It was launched on Mar 6, 2016. TNMIX is managed by 1290 Funds. It was launched on Jul 5, 2015.
Performance
TNVDX vs. TNMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNVDX vs. TNMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund | -0.48% | 10.45% | 8.62% | 9.34% | -8.50% | 10.36% | 13.50% | 18.37% | -3.93% | 8.11% |
TNMIX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund | 5.36% | 13.48% | 9.21% | 5.46% | -11.18% | 3.24% | 4.52% | 8.62% | -3.99% | 3.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNVDX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than TNMIX's 5.36% return.
TNVDX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
TNMIX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 17.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNVDX vs. TNMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNVDX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than TNMIX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TNVDX vs. TNMIX — Risk / Return Rank
TNVDX
TNMIX
TNVDX vs. TNMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) and 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNVDX | TNMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 2.02 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 2.76 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 3.17 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | 15.55 | -8.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNVDX | TNMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.02 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.55 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.59 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNVDX and TNMIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TNVDX vs. TNMIX - Dividend Comparison
TNVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, more than TNMIX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNVDX 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund | 7.72% | 7.69% | 9.73% | 5.52% | 4.67% | 10.18% | 8.15% | 5.58% | 5.02% | 6.06% | 0.00% |
TNMIX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund | 2.06% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 3.38% | 2.86% | 10.67% | 0.78% | 3.06% | 1.24% | 0.37% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
TNVDX vs. TNMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNVDX drawdown since its inception was -20.14%, which is greater than TNMIX's maximum drawdown of -17.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNVDX and TNMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNVDX | TNMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.14% | -17.21% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.48% | -5.63% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.69% | -16.15% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.02% | -2.48% | -2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -3.84% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 1.15% | +0.26% |
Volatility
TNVDX vs. TNMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund (TNVDX) is 2.54%, while 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that TNVDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNVDX | TNMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 3.15% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.42% | 6.72% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.31% | 8.78% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.17% | 7.66% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 7.12% | +1.62% |