TMVE vs. VFVA
TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) and VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. TMVE is passively managed, while VFVA is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMVE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFVA.
Performance
TMVE vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMVE achieves a 18.21% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 15.27% return.
TMVE
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 18.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFVA
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 26.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.44%
- 10Y*
- —
TMVE vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 18.21% | 6.04% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 15.27% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMVE and VFVA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMVE vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank
TMVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFVA
TMVE vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMVE | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMVE vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMVE drawdown since its inception was -8.21%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMVE and VFVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMVE | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -48.58% | +40.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.10% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -7.29% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility
TMVE vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMVE | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 15.11% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 20.09% | -6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 24.25% | -10.71% |
TMVE vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMVE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMVE vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison
TMVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than VFVA's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMVE and VFVA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.
VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMVE and 0.13% for VFVA.
Find the right allocation for TMVE and VFVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer