TMVE vs. QVAL
TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) and QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. TMVE is passively managed, while QVAL is actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMVE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QVAL.
Performance
TMVE vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMVE achieves a 18.21% return, which is significantly higher than QVAL's 16.57% return.
TMVE
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 18.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVAL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- YTD
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
TMVE vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 18.21% | 6.04% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 16.57% | 4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMVE and QVAL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMVE vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TMVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QVAL
TMVE vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMVE | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMVE vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMVE drawdown since its inception was -8.21%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMVE and QVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMVE | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -51.49% | +43.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.35% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -7.73% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.17% | — |
Volatility
TMVE vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMVE | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 14.57% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 21.60% | -8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 22.70% | -9.16% |
TMVE vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMVE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMVE vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison
TMVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than QVAL's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.47% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMVE and QVAL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.
QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMVE and 0.28% for QVAL.
Find the right allocation for TMVE and QVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer