TMV vs. SOXL
TMV (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMV is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%), while SOXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMV returned -0.80%/yr vs 65.39%/yr for SOXL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMV charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
TMV vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMV achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 567.48% return. Over the past 10 years, TMV has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of -0.80%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 65.39% annualized return.
TMV
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.12%
- 10Y*
- -0.80%
SOXL
- 1D
- 5.34%
- 1M
- 119.95%
- YTD
- 567.48%
- 6M
- 502.28%
- 1Y
- 1,438.30%
- 3Y*
- 135.13%
- 5Y*
- 48.72%
- 10Y*
- 65.39%
TMV vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMV Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X | 4.73% | -3.75% | 39.76% | -9.69% | 150.18% | 0.83% | -54.13% | -34.22% | 3.99% | -26.48% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 567.48% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMV and SOXL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010 | 0.20 |
The correlation between TMV and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMV vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
TMV
SOXL
TMV vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMV | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.72 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 33.47 | -33.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 114.79 | -115.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMV | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 14.28 | -14.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.46 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.66 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | 0.52 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
TMV vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMV drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMV and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMV | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.96% | -90.46% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.62% | -43.47% | +21.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.49% | -87.88% | +39.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.49% | -90.46% | +41.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.31% | -90.46% | +8.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.94% | 0.00% | -95.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.60% | -35.01% | -51.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.13% | 12.65% | -1.52% |
Volatility
TMV vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) is 8.15%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.82%. This indicates that TMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMV | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 40.82% | -32.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.18% | 81.29% | -62.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.12% | 102.11% | -72.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.21% | 107.25% | -60.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.44% | 99.04% | -54.60% |
TMV vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMV has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMV vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
TMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
TMV Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X | 2.62% | 2.85% | 3.41% | 3.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.60% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMV and SOXL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to TMV (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMV dropped -98.96% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 65.39% vs -0.80% for TMV. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TMV has been the lower-risk option at 8.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 65.39% return vs -0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for TMV.
TMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
TMV is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while SOXL is Leveraged Equities. TMV tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for TMV and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMV and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer