PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMV vs. ISTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMV vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMV achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than ISTB's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, TMV has underperformed ISTB with an annualized return of 1.86%, while ISTB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.20% annualized return.


TMV

1D
1.99%
1M
13.35%
6M
16.52%
YTD
17.52%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
27.59%
10Y*
1.86%
ALL TIME*
-14.05%

ISTB

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.19%
6M
0.35%
YTD
0.63%
1Y
2.74%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
2.20%
ALL TIME*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.52M$19.72M$25.64M
$29.38M$22.37M$25.43M

TMV vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMV
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X
17.52%-3.75%39.76%-9.69%150.18%0.83%-54.13%-34.22%3.99%-26.48%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.63%6.36%4.37%5.56%-6.08%-0.71%4.75%5.61%1.02%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TMV and ISTB is -0.73, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

-0.56

The correlation between TMV and ISTB shifts across timeframes, from -0.76 (3 years) to -0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMV vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMV
TMV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMV vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMVISTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.34

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

2.61

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

9.39

-7.83

TMV vs. ISTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the ISTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMV and ISTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMV vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMV drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than ISTB's maximum drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMV and ISTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMVISTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.96%

-9.34%

-89.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-1.26%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.49%

-1.36%

-47.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.49%

-9.34%

-39.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.31%

-9.34%

-72.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.44%

-0.27%

-95.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.66%

-1.21%

-85.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.32%

0.35%

+8.97%

Volatility

TMV vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) at 0.48%. This indicates that TMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMVISTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

0.48%

+6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

1.42%

+18.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.60%

1.80%

+25.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.81%

2.81%

+44.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.23%

2.51%

+41.72%

TMV vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMV has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMV vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison

TMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than ISTB's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
3.91%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%
TMV
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X
2.25%2.85%3.41%3.87%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.60%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMV and ISTB have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMV has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to ISTB (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMV dropped -98.96% vs ISTB's -9.34%.

On 10-year performance, ISTB leads with 2.20% vs 1.86% for TMV. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISTB has performed better with a 2.20% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for TMV.

ISTB has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.25% for TMV.

TMV is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while ISTB is Short-Term Bond. TMV tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%), while ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for TMV and 0.06% for ISTB.

ISTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMV and ISTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer