PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMUS vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMUS vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 16.66%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


TMUS

1D
1.77%
1M
2.65%
YTD
-5.91%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
-15.50%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
16.66%

KMB

1D
0.74%
1M
8.12%
YTD
4.05%
6M
1.77%
1Y
-17.99%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMUS vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
-5.91%-6.58%39.70%15.02%20.71%-13.99%71.96%23.28%0.16%10.43%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.05%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TMUS and KMB is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMUS:

$208.40B

KMB:

$34.08B

EPS

TMUS:

$9.41

KMB:

$5.93

PE Ratio

TMUS:

20.09

KMB:

17.26

PEG Ratio

TMUS:

0.31

KMB:

2.98

PS Ratio

TMUS:

2.34

KMB:

2.06

PB Ratio

TMUS:

3.73

KMB:

18.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMUS:

$90.53B

KMB:

$16.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMUS:

$34.92B

KMB:

$5.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

TMUS:

$28.22B

KMB:

$3.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMUS vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMUS vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMUSKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.87

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.67

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

-1.03

+0.14

TMUS vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMUS and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMUS vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMUSKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-36.97%

-49.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.37%

-29.60%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.65%

-34.06%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.65%

-34.06%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-34.06%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.12%

-26.52%

-2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-8.85%

-17.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.87%

19.43%

-1.56%

Volatility

TMUS vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is 7.72%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that TMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMUSKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

8.42%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

16.67%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.99%

25.77%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

20.19%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.08%

21.07%

+5.01%

Dividends

TMUS vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.97%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.08%1.80%1.28%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TMUS vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
23.11B
4.16B
(TMUS) Total Revenue
(KMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TMUS vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
36.9%
Portfolio components
TMUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

TMUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

TMUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMUS and KMB have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs KMB's -36.97%.

TMUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMUS and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer