TMUS vs. KMB
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, TMUS returned 16.24%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for KMB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMUS vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -2.66% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 16.24%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- -2.66%
- 1Y
- -12.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.39%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- -10.77%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- -0.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.89%
TMUS vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -2.66% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 10.35% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and KMB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
TMUS:
$211.72B
KMB:
$36.01B
TMUS:
$9.45
KMB:
$5.93
TMUS:
20.70
KMB:
18.30
TMUS:
0.31
KMB:
3.16
TMUS:
2.41
KMB:
2.19
TMUS:
3.86
KMB:
20.13
TMUS:
$90.53B
KMB:
$16.54B
TMUS:
$34.92B
KMB:
$5.93B
TMUS:
$28.22B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
KMB
TMUS vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMUS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | -0.37 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -0.54 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -36.97% | -49.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.02% | -29.60% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.13% | -34.06% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.13% | -34.06% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.13% | -34.06% | -3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.67% | -22.08% | -4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -8.88% | -17.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.82% | 20.10% | -0.28% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.95%. This indicates that TMUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.23% | 8.95% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.95% | 18.53% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.25% | 27.01% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 20.57% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.17% | 21.23% | +4.94% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than KMB's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.68% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.01% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TMUS vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TMUS vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
TMUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
TMUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
TMUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and KMB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to KMB (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs KMB's -36.97%.
KMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer