TMSRX vs. FSMSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMSRX (T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund) and FSMSX (FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, TMSRX returned 0.99%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for FSMSX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMSRX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for FSMSX.

Performance

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSRX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FSMSX's 4.13% return.

TMSRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: 0.99%
• 10Y*: —

FSMSX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 6M: 4.13%
• 1Y: 8.24%
• 3Y*: 5.44%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund	0.41%	2.95%	5.36%	5.09%	-4.69%	-2.08%	13.21%	7.59%	-4.11%
FSMSX FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund	4.13%	4.13%	4.63%	5.44%	3.17%	13.97%	-3.66%	7.77%	-2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSRX and FSMSX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018	0.02

The correlation between TMSRX and FSMSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (5 years) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TMSRX vs. FSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSRX

TMSRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
TMSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TMSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TMSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
TMSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TMSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FSMSX

FSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMSRX	FSMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.77	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	4.15	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.57	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	5.52	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.80	16.89	+0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSRX and FSMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMSRX	FSMSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.77	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	1.13	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.88	-0.05

Drawdowns

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSRX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, which is greater than FSMSX's maximum drawdown of -8.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSRX and FSMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMSRX	FSMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-8.94%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.83%	-1.46%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.79%	-4.06%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.59%	-4.13%	-6.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.09%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.73%	-1.64%	-1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.48%	-0.28%

Volatility

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) is 0.00%, while FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that TMSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMSRX	FSMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	0.95%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.01%	2.24%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70%	2.91%	-1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.76%	4.62%	-1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.28%	4.65%	-1.37%

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSRX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMSX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMSRX vs. FSMSX - Dividend Comparison

TMSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than FSMSX's 3.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FSMSX FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund	3.96%	4.12%	2.48%	3.61%	4.12%	3.22%	0.77%	2.20%	0.82%
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund	9.49%	7.59%	6.72%	5.95%	2.29%	2.88%	3.35%	3.00%	3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMSRX and FSMSX in my portfolio?

TMSRX and FSMSX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMSRX or FSMSX?

FSMSX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to TMSRX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSRX dropped -10.67% vs FSMSX's -8.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.