PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSMSX vs. LCSIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSMSX and LCSIX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

FSMSX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
26.61%
41.42%
FSMSX
LCSIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSMSX:

0.35

LCSIX:

-1.60

Sortino Ratio

FSMSX:

0.43

LCSIX:

-2.06

Omega Ratio

FSMSX:

1.09

LCSIX:

0.77

Calmar Ratio

FSMSX:

0.38

LCSIX:

-0.67

Martin Ratio

FSMSX:

1.44

LCSIX:

-2.04

Ulcer Index

FSMSX:

0.96%

LCSIX:

3.66%

Daily Std Dev

FSMSX:

3.93%

LCSIX:

4.67%

Max Drawdown

FSMSX:

-9.41%

LCSIX:

-25.05%

Current Drawdown

FSMSX:

-3.58%

LCSIX:

-11.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMSX achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's -7.18% return.


FSMSX

YTD

1.19%

1M

-2.47%

6M

-1.52%

1Y

1.28%

5Y*

3.85%

10Y*

N/A

LCSIX

YTD

-7.18%

1M

-3.01%

6M

-8.21%

1Y

-7.47%

5Y*

4.00%

10Y*

5.21%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSMSX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMSX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.


FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSMSX: current value at 1.89% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.89%
Expense ratio chart for LCSIX: current value at 1.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSMSX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSMSX, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSMSX, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.43-2.06
The chart of Omega ratio for FSMSX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.090.77
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSMSX, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.000.38-0.67
The chart of Martin ratio for FSMSX, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.001.44-2.04
FSMSX
LCSIX

The current FSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the LCSIX Sharpe Ratio of -1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMSX and LCSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.35
-1.60
FSMSX
LCSIX

Dividends

FSMSX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison

FSMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
0.00%3.57%2.97%3.22%0.77%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.66%1.89%10.75%7.14%2.93%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.20%7.35%9.86%

Drawdowns

FSMSX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMSX drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum LCSIX drawdown of -25.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMSX and LCSIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.58%
-11.14%
FSMSX
LCSIX

Volatility

FSMSX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison

FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.64%. This indicates that FSMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.03%
1.64%
FSMSX
LCSIX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab