PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSRX vs. ADANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSRX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than ADANX's 2.97% return.


TMSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.64%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*

ADANX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.97%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
0.41%2.95%5.36%5.09%-4.69%-2.08%13.21%7.59%-4.11%
ADANX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N
2.97%7.75%2.92%4.23%-3.54%5.99%24.85%8.33%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSRX and ADANX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018

0.15

The correlation between TMSRX and ADANX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSRX vs. ADANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSRX
TMSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TMSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ADANX
ADANX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ADANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADANX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ADANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADANX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMSRXADANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

2.04

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

15.60

-11.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

43.05

-25.98

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the ADANX Sharpe Ratio of 4.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSRX and ADANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSRX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum ADANX drawdown of -14.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSRX and ADANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSRXADANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-14.73%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.83%

-0.39%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.79%

-1.70%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.59%

-7.48%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.08%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-3.02%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.14%

+0.06%

Volatility

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) is 0.00%, while AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX) has a volatility of 0.29%. This indicates that TMSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSRXADANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

0.29%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.75%

1.05%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67%

1.42%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

2.61%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.27%

4.28%

-1.01%

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSRX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ADANX's 2.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSRX vs. ADANX - Dividend Comparison

TMSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than ADANX's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADANX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N
1.80%1.86%0.96%2.47%0.10%0.40%1.33%1.81%6.22%6.84%6.83%4.43%
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
9.49%7.59%6.72%5.95%2.29%2.88%3.35%3.00%3.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMSRX and ADANX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADANX has higher volatility (0.29%) compared to TMSRX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSRX dropped -10.67% vs ADANX's -14.73%.

ADANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSRX and ADANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer