FSMSX vs. CSQIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSMSX (FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund) and CSQIX (Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, FSMSX returned 5.34%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for CSQIX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMSX charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for CSQIX.

Performance

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I (CSQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMSX achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than CSQIX's 2.35% return.

FSMSX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 3.86%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: 8.05%
• 3Y*: 5.22%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: —

CSQIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.78%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 2.02%
• 3Y*: 3.74%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 3.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSMSX FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund	3.86%	4.13%	4.63%	5.44%	3.17%	13.97%	-3.66%	7.77%	-3.82%	2.00%
CSQIX Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I	2.35%	0.90%	0.87%	1.95%	5.82%	10.23%	6.39%	4.30%	-5.08%	3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMSX and CSQIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2017	0.19

Return for Risk

FSMSX vs. CSQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMSX

FSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

CSQIX

CSQIX Risk / Return Rank: 5
CSQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CSQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CSQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CSQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CSQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I (CSQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSMSX	CSQIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	0.31	+2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	0.47	+3.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.06	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	0.48	+4.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.48	1.16	+15.32

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the CSQIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMSX and CSQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMSX drawdown since its inception was -8.94%, smaller than the maximum CSQIX drawdown of -13.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMSX and CSQIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMSX	CSQIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.94%	-13.33%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.46%	-5.02%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.06%	-13.33%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.13%	-13.33%	+9.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-13.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-9.26%	+8.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-2.80%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	2.07%	-1.59%

Volatility

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) is 1.49%, while Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I (CSQIX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that FSMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMSX	CSQIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	2.65%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.56%	6.08%	-3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.15%	7.71%	-4.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.65%	10.40%	-5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.66%	8.42%	-3.76%

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMSX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CSQIX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Dividend Comparison

FSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than CSQIX's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSQIX Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I	1.25%	1.28%	13.42%	2.95%	2.80%	9.19%	13.34%	4.97%	1.84%	4.76%	2.11%	0.24%
FSMSX FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund	3.97%	4.12%	2.48%	3.61%	4.12%	3.22%	0.77%	2.20%	0.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMSX and CSQIX in my portfolio?

FSMSX and CSQIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSMSX or CSQIX?

CSQIX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to FSMSX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMSX dropped -8.94% vs CSQIX's -13.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.