FSMSX vs. CSQIX
Compare and contrast key facts about FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund (CSQIX).
FSMSX is managed by FS Investments. It was launched on May 15, 2017. CSQIX is managed by Credit Suisse (New York, NY). It was launched on Mar 29, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSMSX or CSQIX.
Key characteristics
| FSMSX | CSQIX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.03% | 0.66% |
| 1Y Return | 4.43% | 0.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.36% | 2.51% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.42% | 4.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.72 | 0.07 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.42 | 0.12 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.02 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.20 | 0.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.74 | 0.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.77% | 2.17% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.58% | 5.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.41% | -11.28% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.44% | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMSX and CSQIX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FSMSX achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than CSQIX's 0.66% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMSX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CSQIX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund (CSQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Dividend Comparison
FSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than CSQIX's 1.57% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMSX FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund | 3.43% | 3.57% | 2.97% | 3.22% | 0.77% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSQIX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund | 1.57% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 9.19% | 13.34% | 4.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 1.76% |
Drawdowns
FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMSX drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum CSQIX drawdown of -11.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMSX and CSQIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSMSX vs. CSQIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) is 0.73%, while Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund (CSQIX) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that FSMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.