PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMSX vs. SRDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and Stone Ridge Diversified Alternatives Fund (SRDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMSX achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than SRDAX's 4.36% return.


FSMSX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.09%
YTD
3.86%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*

SRDAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
4.36%
6M
4.04%
1Y
8.83%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
3.86%4.13%4.63%5.44%3.17%13.97%-2.13%
SRDAX
Stone Ridge Diversified Alternatives Fund
4.36%0.37%8.46%19.56%2.03%10.62%1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMSX and SRDAX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

-0.00

The correlation between FSMSX and SRDAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMSX vs. SRDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMSX
FSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SRDAX
SRDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SRDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SRDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) and Stone Ridge Diversified Alternatives Fund (SRDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMSXSRDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.54

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

3.35

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

12.97

+3.51

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the SRDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMSX and SRDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMSX drawdown since its inception was -8.94%, smaller than the maximum SRDAX drawdown of -11.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMSX and SRDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMSXSRDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-11.90%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-2.67%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.06%

-6.15%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.13%

-11.90%

+7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.77%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-2.32%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.69%

-0.21%

Volatility

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Volatility Comparison

FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Stone Ridge Diversified Alternatives Fund (SRDAX) at 0.72%. This indicates that FSMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMSXSRDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

0.72%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

2.43%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15%

3.28%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.65%

6.98%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

6.76%

-2.10%

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMSX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SRDAX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMSX vs. SRDAX - Dividend Comparison

FSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than SRDAX's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
3.97%4.12%2.48%3.61%4.12%3.22%0.77%2.20%0.82%
SRDAX
Stone Ridge Diversified Alternatives Fund
8.18%8.53%8.16%14.97%3.22%8.99%3.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMSX and SRDAX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMSX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to SRDAX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMSX dropped -8.94% vs SRDAX's -11.90%.

SRDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMSX and SRDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer