TMSF vs. TCHP
TMSF (T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF) and TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMSF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMSF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for TCHP.
Performance
TMSF vs. TCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSF achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than TCHP's -1.95% return.
TMSF
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCHP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- —
TMSF vs. TCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.92% | 1.29% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | -1.95% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSF and TCHP is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSF vs. TCHP — Risk / Return Rank
TMSF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TCHP
TMSF vs. TCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMSF | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMSF vs. TCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSF drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum TCHP drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSF and TCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSF | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -42.34% | +40.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -7.79% | +7.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -11.40% | +11.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility
TMSF vs. TCHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSF | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 17.13% | -14.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 23.58% | -20.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 23.21% | -20.29% |
TMSF vs. TCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than TCHP's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSF vs. TCHP - Dividend Comparison
TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 3.05% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMSF and TCHP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.
TMSF has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for TCHP.
TMSF is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while TCHP is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TMSF and 0.57% for TCHP.
Find the right allocation for TMSF and TCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer