PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMRC vs. TMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMRC vs. TMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMRC achieves a 43.77% return, which is significantly higher than TMQ's -17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TMRC has underperformed TMQ with an annualized return of 19.51%, while TMQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


TMRC

1D
-4.24%
1M
-15.38%
YTD
43.77%
6M
20.38%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
-2.52%
5Y*
-15.56%
10Y*
19.51%

TMQ

1D
-3.78%
1M
-12.53%
YTD
-17.40%
6M
-26.45%
1Y
154.29%
3Y*
87.51%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMRC vs. TMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMRC
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp
43.77%144.74%-41.84%-67.01%-33.83%11.30%43.90%397.98%17.62%91.78%
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
-17.40%271.55%169.77%-21.82%-66.67%-17.50%-23.08%50.29%58.72%114.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TMRC and TMQ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.06

Over the past year, TMRC and TMQ have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMRC:

$71.96M

TMQ:

$612.11M

EPS

TMRC:

-$0.03

TMQ:

-$0.23

PB Ratio

TMRC:

16.86

TMQ:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMRC:

$0.00

TMQ:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMRC:

$0.00

TMQ:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

TMRC:

-$1.31M

TMQ:

-$7.33M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMRC vs. TMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMRC
TMRC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TMRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMRC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TMRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMRC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

TMQ
TMQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMRC vs. TMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMRCTMQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.47

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

2.23

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

3.18

-2.88

TMRC vs. TMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the TMQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMRC and TMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMRC vs. TMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMRC drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, roughly equal to the maximum TMQ drawdown of -96.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMRC and TMQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMRCTMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.42%

-96.55%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.33%

-69.62%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.33%

-69.62%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.57%

-85.26%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.42%

-88.01%

-7.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.83%

-66.42%

-14.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.01%

-71.91%

+17.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.51%

48.69%

+7.82%

Volatility

TMRC vs. TMQ - Volatility Comparison

Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) has a higher volatility of 26.95% compared to Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) at 23.36%. This indicates that TMRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMRCTMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.95%

23.36%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.03%

60.10%

+26.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

156.48%

235.72%

-79.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.40%

128.52%

-19.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.55%

101.17%

+8.38%

Dividends

TMRC vs. TMQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMRC nor TMQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TMRC vs. TMQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp and Trilogy Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00K40.00K60.00K80.00K100.00K120.00K140.00KJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober202600
(TMRC) Total Revenue
(TMQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TMRC and TMQ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMRC has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to TMQ (23.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMRC dropped -95.42% vs TMQ's -96.55%.

TMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMRC and TMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer