TMQ vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TMQ (Trilogy Metals Inc.) is a stock, while BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Over the past 5 years, TMQ returned 8.95%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for BCI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TMQ vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMQ achieves a -14.15% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 16.69% return.

TMQ

• 1D: -2.37%
• 1M: -9.09%
• YTD: -14.15%
• 6M: -22.76%
• 1Y: 172.06%
• 3Y*: 89.93%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 22.41%

BCI

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -8.66%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 6M: 16.52%
• 1Y: 22.05%
• 3Y*: 11.86%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMQ vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMQ Trilogy Metals Inc.	-14.15%	271.55%	169.77%	-21.82%	-66.67%	-17.50%	-23.08%	50.29%	58.72%	101.89%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	16.69%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	15.09%	26.18%	-2.77%	7.06%	-11.21%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TMQ and BCI is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017	0.19

Return for Risk

TMQ vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMQ

TMQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
TMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
TMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
TMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 38
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMQ vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMQ	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	1.29	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	1.76	+2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.24	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	1.84	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	6.82	-3.26

TMQ vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMQ and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMQ vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMQ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMQ and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMQ	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.55%	-32.69%	-63.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.62%	-12.04%	-57.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.62%	-12.04%	-57.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.43%	-26.50%	-58.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.09%	-12.04%	-53.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.91%	-11.98%	-59.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.51%	3.56%	+44.95%

Volatility

TMQ vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) has a higher volatility of 23.54% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 3.49%. This indicates that TMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMQ	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.54%	3.49%	+20.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.07%	14.94%	+45.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	236.14%	17.18%	+218.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.53%	16.79%	+111.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.16%	15.65%	+85.51%

Dividends

TMQ vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

TMQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.13%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
TMQ Trilogy Metals Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMQ and BCI in my portfolio?

TMQ and BCI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMQ or BCI?

TMQ has higher volatility (23.54%) compared to BCI (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMQ dropped -96.55% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.