TMQ vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TMQ or URA.
Performance
TMQ vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMQ achieves a 213.95% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 19.64% return. Over the past 10 years, TMQ has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 7.35%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.52% annualized return.
TMQ
213.95%
119.51%
176.24%
213.88%
-5.50%
7.35%
URA
19.64%
1.07%
5.37%
21.95%
28.59%
5.52%
Key characteristics
| TMQ | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.81 | 0.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.88 | 1.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.50 | 1.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.25 | 0.30 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.21 | 1.83 |
| Ulcer Index | 20.32% | 12.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 114.38% | 36.23% |
| Max Drawdown | -96.55% | -93.54% |
| Current Drawdown | -71.40% | -65.09% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between TMQ and URA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TMQ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TMQ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
TMQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMQ Trilogy Metals Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 5.16% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
TMQ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMQ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, roughly equal to the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMQ and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TMQ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) has a higher volatility of 71.71% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 9.57%. This indicates that TMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.