PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TMQ vs. URA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TMQ and URA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

TMQ vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
160.40%
9.29%
TMQ
URA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TMQ:

1.77

URA:

-0.10

Sortino Ratio

TMQ:

3.61

URA:

0.12

Omega Ratio

TMQ:

1.45

URA:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

TMQ:

2.25

URA:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

TMQ:

12.60

URA:

-0.28

Ulcer Index

TMQ:

16.46%

URA:

12.68%

Daily Std Dev

TMQ:

117.24%

URA:

37.38%

Max Drawdown

TMQ:

-96.55%

URA:

-93.54%

Current Drawdown

TMQ:

-70.34%

URA:

-70.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMQ achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TMQ has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 8.86%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.


TMQ

YTD

20.69%

1M

16.67%

6M

160.42%

1Y

217.82%

5Y*

-5.75%

10Y*

8.86%

URA

YTD

2.24%

1M

-2.32%

6M

9.29%

1Y

0.31%

5Y*

25.11%

10Y*

5.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TMQ vs. URA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMQ is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMQ is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMQ is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMQ is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMQ is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMQ is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of URA is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of URA is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of URA is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of URA is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of URA is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of URA is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TMQ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TMQ, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.77-0.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for TMQ, currently valued at 3.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.610.12
The chart of Omega ratio for TMQ, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.451.01
The chart of Calmar ratio for TMQ, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.25-0.09
The chart of Martin ratio for TMQ, currently valued at 12.60, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.60-0.28
TMQ
URA

The current TMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMQ and URA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.77
-0.10
TMQ
URA

Dividends

TMQ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

TMQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
2.80%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.85%1.69%1.66%0.45%2.03%7.28%1.96%4.28%

Drawdowns

TMQ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMQ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, roughly equal to the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMQ and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-70.34%
-27.46%
TMQ
URA

Volatility

TMQ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) has a higher volatility of 22.99% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 16.08%. This indicates that TMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
22.99%
16.08%
TMQ
URA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab