TMQ vs. URA

In the year-to-date period, TMQ achieves a 23.28% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TMQ has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 9.86%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.51% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TMQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMQ and URA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TMQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.

The maximum TMQ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, roughly equal to the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMQ and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) has a higher volatility of 33.42% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 8.11%. This indicates that TMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.