PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMQ vs. NB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMQ vs. NB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMQ achieves a -27.38% return, which is significantly lower than NB's -19.72% return.


TMQ

1D
-1.57%
1M
-8.21%
6M
-37.90%
YTD
-27.38%
1Y
96.86%
3Y*
81.33%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
18.67%
ALL TIME*
-0.15%

NB

1D
-1.05%
1M
-10.23%
6M
-27.88%
YTD
-19.72%
1Y
34.65%
3Y*
-2.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.70M$12.76M$17.89M
$3.44M$4.89M$8.46M

TMQ vs. NB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
-27.38%271.55%169.77%-17.86%
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock
-19.72%241.94%-51.41%-57.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TMQ and NB is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023

0.26

Over the past year, TMQ and NB have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMQ:

$540.69M

NB:

$619.47M

EPS

TMQ:

-$0.30

NB:

-$0.45

PB Ratio

TMQ:

4.66

NB:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMQ:

$0.00

NB:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMQ:

$0.00

NB:

-$1.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

TMQ:

-$49.85M

NB:

-$54.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMQ vs. NB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMQ
TMQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NB
NB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMQ vs. NB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMQNBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.16

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.76

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

1.11

+0.76

TMQ vs. NB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is comparable to the NB Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMQ and NB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMQ vs. NB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMQ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than NB's maximum drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMQ and NB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMQNBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.55%

-82.83%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.45%

-66.92%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.45%

-74.71%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.47%

-63.54%

-6.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.89%

-56.14%

-15.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.41%

46.17%

+7.24%

Volatility

TMQ vs. NB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) is 16.25%, while NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a volatility of 24.00%. This indicates that TMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMQNBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.25%

24.00%

-7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.47%

61.96%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

235.30%

100.66%

+134.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.49%

91.17%

+37.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.14%

91.17%

+9.97%

Dividends

TMQ vs. NB - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMQ nor NB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TMQ vs. NB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trilogy Metals Inc. and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TMQ and NB have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NB has higher volatility (24.00%) compared to TMQ (16.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMQ dropped -96.55% vs NB's -82.83%.

NB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMQ and NB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer