PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMRAF vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMRAF vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMRAF achieves a -25.86% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TMRAF having a 13.73% annualized return and VIS not far ahead at 14.22%.


TMRAF

1D
0.00%
1M
10.49%
YTD
-25.86%
6M
-21.73%
1Y
-41.87%
3Y*
-12.60%
5Y*
-9.33%
10Y*
13.73%

VIS

1D
0.51%
1M
2.91%
YTD
15.65%
6M
14.50%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMRAF vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMRAF
Tomra Systems ASA
-25.86%7.13%13.87%-32.05%-27.02%50.97%51.54%46.27%48.12%82.30%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
15.65%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TMRAF and VIS is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2007

0.08

The correlation between TMRAF and VIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMRAF vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMRAF
TMRAF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMRAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMRAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMRAF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TMRAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMRAF Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMRAF vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMRAFVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.27

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

2.24

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

9.28

-10.90

TMRAF vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMRAF Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMRAF and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMRAF vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMRAF drawdown since its inception was -71.64%, which is greater than VIS's maximum drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMRAF and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMRAFVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.64%

-63.51%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.39%

-12.29%

-35.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.94%

-20.80%

-36.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.64%

-22.96%

-48.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.64%

-42.42%

-29.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.80%

-0.34%

-59.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-8.37%

-12.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.82%

2.97%

+22.85%

Volatility

TMRAF vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a higher volatility of 19.08% compared to Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) at 6.71%. This indicates that TMRAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMRAFVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.08%

6.71%

+12.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.28%

14.28%

+26.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.03%

17.20%

+34.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.61%

18.48%

+40.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.87%

20.48%

+29.39%

Dividends

TMRAF vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

TMRAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than VIS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMRAF
Tomra Systems ASA
0.23%1.55%1.39%1.49%1.94%1.01%0.62%1.62%4.28%13.33%0.00%0.00%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.88%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMRAF and VIS have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMRAF has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to VIS (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMRAF dropped -71.64% vs VIS's -63.51%.

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMRAF and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer