TMRAF vs. VIS
TMRAF (Tomra Systems ASA) is a stock, while VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, TMRAF returned 13.73%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for VIS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMRAF vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMRAF achieves a -25.86% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TMRAF having a 13.73% annualized return and VIS not far ahead at 14.22%.
TMRAF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- -25.86%
- 6M
- -21.73%
- 1Y
- -41.87%
- 3Y*
- -12.60%
- 5Y*
- -9.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
TMRAF vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | -25.86% | 7.13% | 13.87% | -32.05% | -27.02% | 50.97% | 51.54% | 46.27% | 48.12% | 82.30% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMRAF and VIS is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2007 | 0.08 |
The correlation between TMRAF and VIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMRAF vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
TMRAF
VIS
TMRAF vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMRAF | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.27 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 2.24 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | 9.28 | -10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMRAF vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMRAF drawdown since its inception was -71.64%, which is greater than VIS's maximum drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMRAF and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMRAF | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.64% | -63.51% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.39% | -12.29% | -35.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.94% | -20.80% | -36.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.64% | -22.96% | -48.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.64% | -42.42% | -29.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.80% | -0.34% | -59.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -8.37% | -12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.82% | 2.97% | +22.85% |
Volatility
TMRAF vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a higher volatility of 19.08% compared to Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) at 6.71%. This indicates that TMRAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMRAF | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.08% | 6.71% | +12.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.28% | 14.28% | +26.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.03% | 17.20% | +34.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.61% | 18.48% | +40.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.87% | 20.48% | +29.39% |
Dividends
TMRAF vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
TMRAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | 0.23% | 1.55% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 1.62% | 4.28% | 13.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMRAF and VIS have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMRAF has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to VIS (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMRAF dropped -71.64% vs VIS's -63.51%.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMRAF and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer