TMLP vs. AMZA
TMLP (Tortoise MLP ETF) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both MLPs funds. TMLP is passively managed, while AMZA is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMLP charges 0.50%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.
Performance
TMLP vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMLP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 25.18% return.
TMLP
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZA
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 22.72%
- YTD
- 25.18%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 19.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
TMLP vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 16.89% | 0.01% |
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 25.18% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMLP and AMZA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMLP vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank
TMLP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMZA
TMLP vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise MLP ETF (TMLP) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMLP | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMLP vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMLP drawdown since its inception was -8.55%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLP and AMZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMLP | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -91.46% | +82.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -8.01% | +3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -44.72% | +42.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.03% | — |
Volatility
TMLP vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMLP | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.22% | 18.20% | -3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 25.60% | -11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 37.16% | -22.94% |
TMLP vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMLP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMLP vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison
TMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than AMZA's 8.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.00% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 3.83% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMLP and AMZA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMLP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMLP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 3.83% for TMLP.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMLP and 2.01% for AMZA.
Find the right allocation for TMLP and AMZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer