TMH vs. IBIF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIF.

Performance

TMH vs. IBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMH

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 2.35%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIF

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 1.40%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 1Y: 3.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. IBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	-2.25%
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	-0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TMH and IBIF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.34

Return for Risk

TMH vs. IBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIF

IBIF Risk / Return Rank: 66
IBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. IBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMH	IBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.26	—

Drawdowns

TMH vs. IBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.32%, which is greater than IBIF's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and IBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMH	IBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.32%	-2.50%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	-0.49%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-0.55%	-5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMH	IBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.94%	2.07%	+23.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.94%	3.50%	+22.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.94%	3.50%	+22.44%

TMH vs. IBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TMH vs. IBIF - Dividend Comparison

TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than IBIF's 4.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	4.94%	4.51%	4.05%	0.96%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	4.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMH and IBIF in my portfolio?

TMH and IBIF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMH or IBIF?

On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMH or IBIF?

IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMH or IBIF?

IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 4.87% for TMH.

What is the main difference between TMH and IBIF?

TMH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IBIF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.10% for IBIF.