TMFX vs. MFMO
TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) and MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Next Index, while MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool. TMFX is passively managed, while MFMO is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TMFX vs. MFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than MFMO's 25.49% return.
TMFX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFMO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 11.78%
- YTD
- 25.49%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFX vs. MFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 4.09% | -0.20% |
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 25.49% | -1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFX and MFMO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFX vs. MFMO — Risk / Return Rank
TMFX
MFMO
TMFX vs. MFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFX | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFX | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 2.24 | -2.12 |
Drawdowns
TMFX vs. MFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, which is greater than MFMO's maximum drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and MFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFX | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -12.05% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | 0.00% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -2.42% | -11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFX vs. MFMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFX | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 24.50% | -7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 24.50% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 24.50% | -1.11% |
TMFX vs. MFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TMFX and MFMO have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
TMFX vs. MFMO - Dividend Comparison
TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFX and MFMO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMFX and MFMO have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
TMFX has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
TMFX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MFMO is Momentum.
Find the right allocation for TMFX and MFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer