TMFX vs. TMFC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Next Index, while TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFX returned 12.55%/yr vs 24.09%/yr for TMFC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

TMFX vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's 5.63% return.

TMFX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 6M: -0.33%
• 1Y: 11.91%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMFC

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 14.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFX vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF	2.16%	10.41%	16.04%	17.95%	-28.16%	-0.65%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	5.63%	19.55%	35.17%	47.04%	-30.86%	-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFX and TMFC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021	0.79

The correlation between TMFX and TMFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TMFX vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFX

TMFX Risk / Return Rank: 20
TMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
TMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 45
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFX vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFX	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	1.66	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	2.28	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.29	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	1.87	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	6.78	-4.06

TMFX vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFX and TMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMFX vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and TMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFX	TMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-33.06%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	-12.64%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.05%	-20.06%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.61%	-3.67%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.58%	-6.75%	-7.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	3.48%	+0.91%

Volatility

TMFX vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) have volatilities of 5.37% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFX	TMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	5.31%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	11.15%	+1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.16%	14.24%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.34%	20.48%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.34%	22.00%	+1.34%

TMFX vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMFX and TMFC have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

TMFX vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than TMFC's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.06%	0.16%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFX and TMFC in my portfolio?

TMFX and TMFC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFX or TMFC?

TMFX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to TMFC (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFX dropped -34.72% vs TMFC's -33.06%.

Which ETF is better, TMFX or TMFC?

On 3-year performance, TMFC leads with 24.09% vs 12.55% for TMFX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFX or TMFC?

Over the 3-year period, TMFC has performed better with a 24.09% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFX or TMFC?

TMFX and TMFC have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFX or TMFC?

TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.05% for TMFX.

What is the main difference between TMFX and TMFC?

TMFX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while TMFC is Large Cap Growth Equities. TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while TMFC tracks Motley Fool 100 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.