PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFX vs. MFIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFX vs. MFIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than MFIG's 5.69% return.


TMFX

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.95%
YTD
4.09%
6M
4.52%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
10Y*

MFIG

1D
-0.85%
1M
8.02%
YTD
5.69%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFX vs. MFIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TMFX
Motley Fool Next Index ETF
4.09%-0.20%
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
5.69%-0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFX and MFIG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFX vs. MFIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFX
TMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MFIG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFX vs. MFIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFXMFIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.93

TMFX vs. MFIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFXMFIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.72

-0.60

Drawdowns

TMFX vs. MFIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, which is greater than MFIG's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and MFIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFXMFIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-14.29%

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.85%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.38%

-4.65%

-9.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

Volatility

TMFX vs. MFIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFXMFIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

16.54%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.39%

16.54%

+6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

16.54%

+6.85%

TMFX vs. MFIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMFX and MFIG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

TMFX vs. MFIG - Dividend Comparison

TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFX
Motley Fool Next Index ETF
0.05%0.05%0.06%0.16%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFX and MFIG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMFX and MFIG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

TMFX has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

TMFX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MFIG is Large Cap Growth Equities. TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFX and MFIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer