TMFX vs. MFIG
TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) and MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Next Index, while MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TMFX vs. MFIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than MFIG's 5.69% return.
TMFX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFIG
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFX vs. MFIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 4.09% | -0.20% |
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 5.69% | -0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFX and MFIG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFX vs. MFIG — Risk / Return Rank
TMFX
MFIG
TMFX vs. MFIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFX | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFX | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.72 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
TMFX vs. MFIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, which is greater than MFIG's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and MFIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFX | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -14.29% | -20.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -0.85% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -4.65% | -9.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFX vs. MFIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFX | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 16.54% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 16.54% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 16.54% | +6.85% |
TMFX vs. MFIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TMFX and MFIG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
TMFX vs. MFIG - Dividend Comparison
TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFX and MFIG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMFX and MFIG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
TMFX has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
TMFX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while MFIG is Large Cap Growth Equities. TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index.
Find the right allocation for TMFX and MFIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer