TMFE vs. TMFC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index, while TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFE returned 17.10%/yr vs 24.09%/yr for TMFC. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

TMFE vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's 5.63% return.

TMFE

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: -0.66%
• 6M: -1.05%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMFC

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 14.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFE vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF	-0.66%	11.10%	27.95%	41.12%	-25.84%	-0.21%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	5.63%	19.55%	35.17%	47.04%	-30.86%	-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFE and TMFC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021	0.92

The correlation between TMFE and TMFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMFE vs. TMFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMFE	TMFC
Technology	33.6%	44.5%
Consumer Cyclical	17.2%	11.1%
Communication Services	15.3%	16.6%
Consumer Defensive	10.0%	3.8%
Financial Services	9.0%	12.1%
Healthcare	8.8%	4.4%
Industrials	4.3%	4.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.6%
Energy	-	1.7%
Real Estate	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

TMFE vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFE

TMFE Risk / Return Rank: 18
TMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
TMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 45
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFE vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFE	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.66	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	2.28	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.29	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	1.87	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	6.78	-4.33

TMFE vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFE and TMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMFE vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and TMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFE	TMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.21%	-33.06%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-12.64%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.81%	-20.06%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-3.67%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.28%	-6.75%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	3.48%	-0.41%

Volatility

TMFE vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) is 4.31%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that TMFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFE	TMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	5.31%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	11.15%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	14.24%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.24%	20.48%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.24%	22.00%	-2.76%

TMFE vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMFE and TMFC have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

TMFE vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than TMFC's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF	0.32%	0.32%	0.44%	0.45%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFE and TMFC in my portfolio?

TMFE and TMFC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFE or TMFC?

TMFC has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to TMFE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.21% vs TMFC's -33.06%.

Which ETF is better, TMFE or TMFC?

On 3-year performance, TMFC leads with 24.09% vs 17.10% for TMFE. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, TMFE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFE or TMFC?

Over the 3-year period, TMFC has performed better with a 24.09% return vs 17.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFE or TMFC?

TMFE and TMFC have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFE or TMFC?

TMFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.14% for TMFC.

What is the main difference between TMFE and TMFC?

TMFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TMFC is Large Cap Growth Equities. TMFE tracks Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index, while TMFC tracks Motley Fool 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and Motley Fool.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.