TMFS vs. DBC
TMFS (Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. TMFS is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMFS returned -1.05%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for DBC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
TMFS vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 26.70% return.
TMFS
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 0.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 22.16%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
TMFS vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 2.17% | -1.59% | 15.41% | 25.40% | -33.15% | -2.38% | 58.52% | 40.19% | -6.14% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 26.70% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -15.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFS and DBC is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018 | 0.20 |
The correlation between TMFS and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFS vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
TMFS
DBC
TMFS vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFS | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.28 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.83 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 6.41 | -6.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFS vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFS | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -76.36% | +27.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.73% | -16.54% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.05% | -16.54% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.68% | -27.34% | -18.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.22% | -26.71% | +9.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -46.13% | +26.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 4.71% | +1.02% |
Volatility
TMFS vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) is 5.27%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that TMFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFS | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 6.07% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 16.67% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 18.84% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 19.28% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 17.80% | +7.64% |
TMFS vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TMFS and DBC have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
TMFS vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.63% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 2.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFS and DBC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to TMFS (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFS dropped -48.79% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 5-year performance, DBC leads with 11.23% vs -1.05% for TMFS. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, TMFS has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBC has performed better with a 11.23% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFS and DBC have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.00% for TMFS.
TMFS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Invesco.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFS and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer