TMFM vs. IVOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO).
TMFM and IVOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFM is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Jun 17, 2014. IVOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
TMFM vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMFM vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -14.00% | -8.98% | 17.54% | 21.81% | -27.36% | 2.08% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 2.57% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 3.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -14.00% return, which is significantly lower than IVOO's 2.57% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- YTD
- -14.00%
- 6M
- -18.69%
- 1Y
- -19.31%
- 3Y*
- 2.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOO
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMFM vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
IVOO
TMFM vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | 0.82 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | 1.30 | -2.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.18 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 1.24 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | 5.38 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 0.82 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 0.58 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and IVOO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMFM vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IVOO's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.32% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and IVOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -42.33% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | -14.17% | -13.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.02% | -6.10% | -23.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -5.31% | -10.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.28% | 3.27% | +8.01% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is 5.83%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that TMFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 6.56% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 11.90% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 21.22% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 19.73% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 21.17% | -0.69% |