TMFM vs. SCHG

In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -1.59% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TMFM Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFM and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.06%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.

The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is 6.16%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that TMFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.