PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFG vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFG vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.51% return.


TMFG

1D
1.85%
1M
2.53%
6M
5.07%
YTD
5.76%
1Y
8.13%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.47%

VEA

1D
0.59%
1M
0.32%
6M
7.64%
YTD
14.51%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
10.06%
ALL TIME*
5.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$305.59K$359.54K$429.54K
$651.74M$763.09M$794.89M

TMFG vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMFG
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
5.76%6.75%15.45%28.36%-28.17%1.91%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.51%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and VEA is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021

0.77

The correlation between TMFG and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TMFG vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMFG
VEA

Industrials

23.9%
17.9%

Financial Services

17.9%
23.1%

Communication Services

13.0%
3.2%

Technology

12.4%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.3%

Real Estate

8.1%
2.5%

Healthcare

6.6%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.3%

Basic Materials

2.1%
6.9%

Energy

-

4.5%

Utilities

-

3.1%

Industrials

TMFG
23.9%
VEA
17.9%

Financial Services

TMFG
17.9%
VEA
23.1%

Communication Services

TMFG
13.0%
VEA
3.2%

Technology

TMFG
12.4%
VEA
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TMFG
10.7%
VEA
7.3%

Real Estate

TMFG
8.1%
VEA
2.5%

Healthcare

TMFG
6.6%
VEA
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

TMFG
5.4%
VEA
5.3%

Basic Materials

TMFG
2.1%
VEA
6.9%

Energy

TMFG

-

VEA
4.5%

Utilities

TMFG

-

VEA
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFG vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFG
TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFG vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMFGVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.32

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.63

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

9.84

-7.51

TMFG vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFG and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFGVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-60.68%

+27.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-11.63%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-13.45%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.86%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-13.20%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.11%

+0.39%

Volatility

TMFG vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 3.92%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFGVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

5.40%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

15.35%

-4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

17.26%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

16.85%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

17.22%

+1.23%

TMFG vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFG vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than VEA's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMFG
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.27%13.94%5.42%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.55%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFG and VEA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to TMFG (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 3-year performance, VEA leads with 19.09% vs 12.52% for TMFG. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VEA has performed better with a 19.09% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.26% for TMFG.

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFG and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer